Mining, Aussies, Water, & YOU!

Mining, Aussies, Water, & YOU!

Would YOU Swim in Battery-Acid Water?

These days, there are several types of "mining."
First, and MOST Importantly, there's Minecraft. This popular game, originally created by Mojang, was purchased by Microsoft for $2.5billiion at the end of 2014. Minecraft History

Don't Fall IN!!! :-)

Don't Fall IN!!! :-)

You may have also heard about Bitcoin Mining, with megaservers & computers that essentially do math problems all day to generate "money".

Dang, that guy really looks like he's doing some hard work! I wonder if he knows pick-axes don't play well with computers...

Dang, that guy really looks like he's doing some hard work! I wonder if he knows pick-axes don't play well with computers...

Lastly, there is the conventional, old, hum-drum kind of mining. This would be the kind where rocks are extracted from Earth to be used in production of goods & commodities.
Below, we have a beautifully Terraced Mine, with a bulldozer at peace in its natural environment:
Terraced Mine
We do need mining in our current society. It may not be pretty, but you couldn't read this very text without electronics & the mined resources needed to build them. There are "greener" alternatives being researched, as shown in yesterday's article Hot Solar Homes. However, they are more expensive, and require a stronger eco/environmentally-friendly consumer to popularize them.
Most mines appear to be run in a fairly responsible manner. In the USA, and abroad, there are industry-enforced policies & procedures, government-imposed regulations, and even local groups who have public say over mine operations. Unfortunately, there are also a number of mining locations that behave unethically, and cause significant harm to the environment and ecosystems around them.
Redbank copper mine creek sulphide residue This is Hanrahan's Creek stream bank near the Gulf of Carpentaria that runs past the Redbank Copper mining operation in the "Northern Territory" of Australia.
As is clearly evident, this spot has heavy contamination from leaks within the mining operation. Note that eerie green tint to the water & white mold-looking material on the rocks. Those are not photo-lens errors or filter effects. The Redbank mine actually shut-down 18 years ago, but has been leaking copper sulphide into the nearby creek & other water sources for years.
You know it's bad when signs such as these show up. Contaminated Water Of course, it is often the case that the danger has been present long before the sign goes up. And that's exactly the situation here in the Gulf of Carpentaria. Recall, the mine shut down nearly 2 decades ago. We can reasonably suspect that the leaking has been an issue for some period of time spanning 1yr-17.99years between shut-down & current events.
And current events are exactly what brings Redbank Copper back into the news. The oldest news article I can find on the issue dates to 2013, which seems to be when residents & government officials began to publicly confront the issue. History Search
It appears, according to North Territory Prosecution, that the entire situation will have legal procedings in the Magistrates Court this August 2015.


There are many sites that have similar issues. This one, the Redbank Copper mine, was allegedly improperly sealed upon shut-down. That allowed copper sulphide to leak ever since the original owners left the site. According to an earlier water-analysis of the Hanrahan Creek, the water has a PH level close to battery acid. Doesn't sound like something I would be interested in drinking/using.

What do you think?
  • Should mining companies need authorization to begin work/construction?
  • Or, should they have to talk with community leaders before starting to dig?
  • Or, is there another approach you would prefer?
    Discussion Continues in Comments Below:


  • You can find the rest of my Analysis Articles in the Notebook

  • Pictures, Videos, Podcasts, Audio, & other Media can be found in Media

Have a Great Day, Enjoy the Show, and Keep Improving

Hot Solar Homes

Hot Solar Homes

Baked Humans Included:

*Disregarding the blatant hippie-reference, this is really cool design + technology in architecture & construction.

Hot Solar Homes

+

ebay solar collector


*Click or Tap pictures & Hover to view caption notes as an overlay.

1. It can be notoriously difficult to get efficiency measures for alternative-housing systems.

2. In the Southern USA, I don't have huge use for heat, but I can certainly commiserate with the opposite: Paying out the nose for A/C to keep from suffocating. 
Let's find out what % that 1700 is out of the total households of Germany, Switzerland, & Austria: [Wiki Households by Nation](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/List_of_countries_by_number_of_households)
>Germany | 40,076,000
Switzerland | 3,362,073
Austria | 3,566,489
Total | 47,004,562
1700/47004562 = | 3.616670228732266e-5 (...A REALLY small %)
BUT, according to the article, 60% of heat demand is reduced in those 1700 households.

3. Ahh, the wonders of government stipulations. It's a good thing they wrote down that all buildings have to be "nearly zero-energy" from 2021 on. Now that it's on-paper, the humans will surely do it! By the way, I wonder just how close to 0 "nearly zero" is.
Relevant Google Images Search: [0=Zero?](https://www.google.com/search?q=eu+near+zero+energy+building&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=993&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAgQ_AUoA2oVChMIlsPO_rqQxwIVURmSCh3YsgK0#imgrc=_ "How close to 0") //INSERT IMG FROM BRADLEYSCI FOLDER ONEDRIVE
4. ONLY 9 Houses Monitored/Measured!? Time for even more math...
9/1700= | 0.005294117647058824 or 0.529% (LESS than 1% of the homes)
30 Homes would have provided a recording of 1.764% of the homes, and would at least fall within Minimum Recommended guidelines for most Scientific/Statistical analysis. 
Found out that "Heiz" is a short-form of "Heizen," which refers to heat/hotness. [Heiz](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/heiz "heiz=hot")
Researchers get a little pat-on-the-back & got to work with buddies at a technical school.
I wonder what Mr. Stryi-Hipp's comment "over multiple heating periods" means: Is that several days? Weeks? Months? (I'm guessing days based on what follows...)
€1,500,000 in funding from a super-long-government-bureacracy-name-that-just-keeps-going-and-going-and-going, because... Federal Government YAY! /sarc

5. Oh, ok they built a model/simulation! They must have run a bunch of tests with a light-source to simulate the sun & see how to optimize the heating from... Wait... Reduce the tank? Increase the solar panels? Increase the most expensive part? Like, the part that the article JUST stated was "expensive"? I guess it WOULD be good for grant money, home price inflation, and keeping those precious-mineral-miners in their miserable places.
**Palm-->Forehead*
Hopefully they'll get cheap ones from ebay? [ebay solar collector](http://www.ebay.com/bhp/solar-collector "ebay solar collector"

6. Wow! I believe we may just have to hand out a physics award. Heat radiates outward? Astounding! 
AND, you can direct it away from the house using a window?? Again, I gasp at the innovation.

1. It can be notoriously difficult to get efficiency measures for alternative-housing systems.

2. In the Southern USA, I don't have huge use for heat, but I can certainly commiserate with the opposite: Paying out the nose for A/C to keep from suffocating.

Let's find out what % that 1700 is out of the total households of Germany, Switzerland, & Austria: Wiki Households by Nation

| Nation | Households |
| Germany | 40,076,000 |
| Switzerland | 3,362,073 |
| Austria | 3,566,489 |
| Total | 47,004,562 |

BUT, according to the article, 60% of heat demand is reduced in those 1700 households.

| 1700/47004562 | 3.616670228732266e-5 (...A REALLY small % of households researched) |

3. Ahh, the wonders of government stipulations. It's a good thing they wrote down that all buildings have to be "nearly zero-energy" from 2021 on. Now that it's on-paper, the humans will surely do it! By the way, I wonder just how close to 0 "nearly zero" is.
Relevant Google Images Search: 0=Zero Energy?

4. ONLY 9 Houses Monitored/Measured!? Time for even more math... 9/1700= | 0.005294117647058824 or 0.529% (LESS than 1% of the homes) 30 Homes would have provided a recording of 1.764% of the homes, and would at least fall within Minimum Recommended guidelines for most Scientific/Statistical analysis.

They've named the research the "Heizsolar" Project. "Heiz" is a short-form of "Heizen," which refers to heat/hotness Wiki 'Heiz'. I'll bet you get the "solar" part. What I don't get is if it seems repetitive in native Dutch/German.

Researchers get a little pat-on-the-back & got to work with buddies at a technical school.

I wonder what Mr. Stryi-Hipp's comment "over multiple heating periods" means: Is that several days? Weeks? Months? (I'm guessing days based on what follows...)
€1,500,000 in funding from a super-long-government-bureacracy-name-that-just-keeps-going-and-going-and-going, because... Federal Government YAY! /sarc

5. Oh, ok they built a model/simulation! They must have run a bunch of tests with a light-source to simulate the sun & see how to optimize the heating from... Wait... Reduce the tank? Increase the solar panels?
Increase the most expensive part? Like, the part that the article JUST stated was "expensive"? I guess it WOULD be good for grant money, home price inflation, and keeping those precious-mineral-miners in their miserable places.
*Palm-->Forehead
Hopefully they'll get cheap ones from ebay? ebay solar collector

6. Wow! I believe we may just have to hand out a Physics award. Heat radiates outward? Astounding! AND, you can direct it away from the house using a window?? Again, I gasp at the innovation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm kind-of sorry for the snarky tone of this piece, but seriously... I got into this article thinking it would be inspiring, full of ideas to optimize housing. Instead, it turned out to be a weak attempt at research and even weaker resulting suggestions. The "Benefit Tomorrow" is to NOT be tricked by lame research. If you would like to see some revolutionary housing & building, I encourage you to take a look at these following links:

* Google "Sustainable Tiny Housing" pond house Landed


  • You can find the rest of my Analysis Articles in the Notebook
  • Pictures, Videos, Podcasts, Audio, & other Media can be found in Media

Source Links/Pages:

Social Links for Sources:

Have a Great Day, Enjoy the Show, and Keep Improving

Speedy Highs vs Slow & Low!

Doing Drugs at Roller-Coaster Speed!

Analysis: "How fast and how often: The pharmacokinetics of drug use are decisive in addiction."

Faster & more intense "hits" lead to stronger addiction?

girl<em>needle</em>spoon<em>powder</em>table


*Click or Tap pictures & Hover to view caption notes as an overlay.

1. Duh. If you don't do it, you can't be addicted... Just like very few are addicted to jumping into volcanoes...

2. "...Is also a mouthful for most people to pronounce" Did she really just go from the slang "joint" to scientific term, and then back into slang/"magic"? Why not just call it "pot" or "marijuana" to be consistent? *It must have proven too difficult to change "joint" & "magic brownie" to more "sciencey" words. -The concentration/dose is higher or quicker-acting depending on the route of administration. Makes sense, given knowledge of drug-tolerance build-up.

3. This research is a Meta-analysis of "available literature" on drug dosage, frequency, etc... *Yeah, the Nicotine skin patch is 'Therapeutic...' That's why you slap on 5 of the suckers every morning!

4. Both intravenous & airborne (inhaled/smoked) products largely bypass the blood-brain-barrier, attributing to the more rapid increase in dose + decline via these methods. *Because of the peak-effect, users will feel a stronger withdrawal symptom (of sorts) & take more of the drug to "maintain" their level of effect. This leads to increasing & plateauing effects, causing the user to need more/stronger doses.

5. Absorption rate (into blood) from CRYSTALS/powder in lungs WILL be slower than if it is atomized (smoked) or diluted & used intravenously. Another duh-moment *ON the bright side, this is great info for speedsters/coke-heads who want their fix NOW! Why bother with snorting & nasal bleeding? Just go for straight-up lung cancer & those quicker highs!

6. Samaha, this is astounding! "...Using patches is not [addictive]". Pretty sure there are a bunch of people who use patches/gum for YEARS. They're not addicted though, right?

7. It Would be nice for cocaine addicts to have a step-down program, something where they could reduce their dose or spread it out over time... Oh, wait...

8. So, IF "drug use is the norm," that means 51%+ use drugs, and "15-30% will become addicted." Min-Max addiction = 7.65%-15.3%. If that's Actually the addiction rates (I doubt it) in Montreal, it's still not a "norm"/majority...

Take-Away: If you're going to do drugs, CONSIDER the effects & rapidity that you desire & the route of administration you will pursue! "Live Long & Prosper!" Or, just go chill on the couch while your dealer hooks you up to an IV Machine. Just don't forget the nicotine patches.

*IF you or a loved one are suffering from addiction, seek a professional.


  • You can find the rest of my Analysis Articles in the Notebook
  • Pictures, Videos, Podcasts, Audio, & other Media can be found in Media

Source Links/Pages:


Social Links for Sources:

Have a Great Day, Enjoy the Show, and Keep Improving